Reason to trust
How Our News is Made
Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality
Ad discliamer
Morbi pretium leo et nisl aliquam mollis. Quisque arcu lorem, ultricies quis pellentesque nec, ullamcorper eu odio.
World Liberty Financial’s native token WLFI lost roughly 17% of its value on Wednesday as a governance proposal affecting more than 62 billion WLFI tokens officially opened for community voting — and the backlash was immediate.
A Token Already Deep In The Red
WLFI was trading at around $0.06 at the time of writing, according to data from CoinGecko. That marks a 70% drop since the token first reached open markets, making Wednesday’s selloff the latest in a long string of losses for holders of the Trump-family-linked DeFi project.
The proposal behind the price drop would impose strict vesting schedules on tokens currently held by early investors and insiders. Under the plan, early investors face a two-year lockup cliff, followed by two more years of gradual release.
Founders, team members, and advisers get the same two-year cliff but with a three-year linear vest after that. Voting runs through May 7.
Token unlock proposal is now live for vote. ☝️ This is one of the most significant governance proposals in WLFI history. Here’s what’s at stake.
— WLFI (@worldlibertyfi) April 29, 2026
World Liberty Financial framed the move as a show of long-term commitment. “62,282,252,205 locked WLFI tokens are subject to this proposal,” the project said in a post on X. “None of it touches the market for a minimum of two years if passed.”
Voting Numbers Tell Only Part Of The Story
On paper, the vote is going well. As of Wednesday, 99.95% of cast votes supported the proposal, and the required quorum of 1 billion WLFI tokens had already been cleared, with 6 billion tokens in favor and just 3.2 million against.
But those numbers don’t capture the full picture. Criticism has been loud on X, where replies to World Liberty’s announcement were largely negative.
The voting structure itself drew sharp criticism — anyone who does not cast a vote risks having their tokens locked up with no end date. That mechanic has been widely called coercive.
All the $WLFI early investors who thought they were sitting on solid profits just got rugged, by the Trump family themselves.
This essentially gives them another shot at squeezing the same lemon they’ve been inflating with hot air for the past two years. Which, what a surprise,… https://t.co/yLSNcfeZlm
— Simon Dedic (@sjdedic) April 15, 2026
Moonrock Capital founder Simon Dedic was among the most pointed critics. Reports indicate he compared the proposal to a rug pull and raised questions about the timing — the two-year unlock period lines up with the remainder of US President Donald Trump’s time in office.
Tron founder Justin Sun, who holds a significant amount of WLFI, called it one of the “most absurd” proposals he had ever come across.
World Liberty Defends The Structure
The team behind World Liberty Financial said the vesting design was built to create what they described as a “more clear, bounded picture of governance preferences.” The goal, they said, was to keep tokens in the hands of people who are genuinely committed to the project’s future.
The proposal was first submitted to the governance community on April 15 before going live for voting this week. World Liberty Financial called it “one of the most significant governance proposals in WLFI history.”
Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView
